The Consultant has a Ph. D, vast experience of high-performance systems architecture, a black belt in karate and a reputation as a genius. He's been brought in by senior management at vast but necessary expense for a strategic rethink of the way data is shared between systems, while implementing SOA, improving performance and finding the Higgs Boson. Needless to say, he tends towards the view that database development is overrated. He's already sorted out the data warehouse. Overheard by our correspondent:
I’ve finished the design for the data warehouse. Although I say design, it’s pretty simple. That’s why it was so quick. All data warehouses are essentially the same in that they are a dimensional model. That means that you essentially have everything that is a fact, an immutable fact [waves arms expressively], in the fact table. Just the one, big, table. That’s why they’re so attractive as reporting solutions - everything is in the same place so it’s easy to understand and the reporting is easy to automate. So in that fact table you’ve got all trades, the cashflows, positions, accounting information, accounts, exceptions, counterparties. Anything that’s a fact goes in that table [does wide googly eyes expression with dramatic pause]. Then anything derived is called a dimension, like for instance P&L calculations, whether the account is on balance sheet, or off... they go in the dimension table. Basically all we have to do is just pump messages into that fact table from the bus and then recalculate the dimensions in the dimension table periodically, and that’s the technical job. Getting the facts in there and getting the calculations done.
